Skip to content
# consistent hashing medium

consistent hashing medium

Suppose our hash function output range in between zero to 2**32 or INT_MAX, then thi… A method, system, computer-readable storage medium and apparatus for balanced and consistent placement of resource management responsibilities within a multi-computer environment, such as a cluster, that are both scalable and make efficient use of cluster resources are provided. Let’s consider what an “optimal” function would do here. Perform modulo operation on hash of the key to get the array index. The algorithm works by using a hash of the key as the seed for a random number generator. Consistent hashing is a strategy for dividing up keys/data between multiple machines.. If we need to store a new key, we can do the same and store it in one of the server depending on the output of server = hash (key) modulo 3. One section of the paper described a new consistent hashing algorithm which has come to be known as “maglev hashing”. Consistent hashing algorithm vary in how easy and effective it is to add servers with different weights. The last bucket it lands in is the result. Jump Hash addresses the two disadvantages of ring hashes: it has no memory overhead and virtually perfect key distribution. It’s a trick question: you can’t answer it in isolation. The main limitation is that it only returns an integer in the range 0..numBuckets-1. Since there will be many keys which will map to the same index, a list or a bucket is attached to each index to store all objects mapping to the same index. The algorithm effectively produces a lookup table that allows finding a node in constant time. This study mentioned for the first time the term consistent hashing. To add a new object, we hash the key, find the index and check the bucket at that index. To find a key we do the same thing, find the position of the key on the circle and then move forward until you find a server replica. If the object is not in the bucket then add it. Increasing the number of replicas to 1000 points per server reduces the standard deviation to ~3.2%, and a much smaller 99% confidence interval of 0.92 to 1.09. More recently, consistent hashing has been repurposed It’s fast and splits the load evenly. Another paper from Google “Multi-Probe Consistent Hashing” (2015) attempts to address this. It may be the fastest consistent hashing in C#. In that situation, we will try to distribute the hash table to multiple servers to avoid memory limitation of one server. For our testing environment, we set up a cache view using 100 caches and created 1000 copies of each cache on the unit circle. In 2016, Google released Maglev: A Fast and Reliable Software Network Load Balancer. To find an object by key, hash the key and get the index and looks for the key in the bucket at that index. When you do an image search for “consistent hashing”, this is what you get: You can think of the circle as all integers 0 ..2³²-1. A Fast, Minimal Memory, Consistent Hash Algorithm John Lamping, Eric Veach Google Abstract We present jump consistent hash, a fast, minimal memory, consistent hash algorithm that can be expressed in about 5 lines of code. the primary means for replication is to ensure data survives single or multiple machine failures. Here are all the repositories implementing the algorithms I discuss: unsigned int k_limit = floorf(pct * 40.0 * ketama->numbuckets); limit := int(float32(float64(pct) * 40.0 * float64(numbuckets))), func Hash(key uint64, numBuckets int) int32 {, func (r *Rendezvous) Lookup(k string) string {, Consistent Hashing and Random Trees: Distributed Caching Protocols for Relieving Hot Spots on the World Wide Web, Dynamo: Amazon’s Highly Available Key-value Store, A Fast, Minimal Memory, Consistent Hash Algorithm”, Maglev: A Fast and Reliable Software Network Load Balancer, Predictive Load-Balancing: Unfair But Faster & More Robust, Actionable advice to start learning to code. Dynamic load balancing lies at the heart of distributed caching. The algorithm was actually included in the 2011 release of the Guava libraries and indicates it was ported from the C++ code base. consistent Hashing 1013 RepliesWhen working on distributed systems, we often have to distribute some kind of workload on different machines (nodes) of a cluster so we have to rely on a predi. Merriam-Webster defines the noun hash as “ Rendezvous you take the next highest (or lowest). Let’s explore different data structure for the above use-case. Objects (and their keys) are distributed among several servers. But ideally the output range of hash functions are very large and it will be impractical and waste of memory to store objects in array. Each existing algorithm has its own specification: MD5 produces 128-bit hash values. Non-cryptographic hash functions like xxHash, MetroHash or SipHash1–3 are all good replacements. To see which node a given key is stored on, it’s hashed into an integer. That is, send more (or less) load to one server as to the rest. And keys should only move to the new server, never between two old servers. All keys which are mapped to replicas Sij are stored on server Si. This comes with significant memory cost. To find out which server to ask for a given key or store a given key, we need to first locate the key on the circle and move in a clockwise direction until we find a server. … The first is that if you change the number of servers, almost every key will map somewhere else. As the keys are distributed across servers, the load is checked and a node is skipped if it’s too heavily loaded already. It’s now used by Cassandra, Riak, and basically every other distributed system that needs to distribute load over servers. Consistent hashing Our system is based on consistent hashing,a scheme developed in a previous theoretical paper [6]. The modulo can be expensive but it’s almost certainly cheaper than hashing the key. Yes they are well distributed but they are also too expensive to compute — there are much cheaper options available. This tends to rule out cryptographic ones like SHA-1 or MD5. First, consistent hashing is a relatively fast operation. With a small number of vnodes, different servers could be assigned wildly different numbers of keys. Using consistent hashing for load balancing seems like an appealing idea. Here’s the code taken from github.com/dgryski/go-jump, translated from the C++ in the paper. A ring has a fixed-length. The first, from 2016, Consistent Hashing with Bounded Loads. This means it doesn’t support arbitrary node removal. We mention other positive aspects of our Web caching system, such as fault tolerance and load balancing, in Section 5. And I want to do this without having to store a global directory. If server replica is Sij then the key is stored in server Si. In addi- Consistent hashing helps us to distribute data across a set of nodes/servers in such a way that reorganization is minimum. The original consistent hashing paper called servers “nodes”. It then uses the random numbers to “jump forward” in the list of buckets until it falls off the end. As a point of comparison, to have the equivalent peak-to-mean ratio of 1.05 for Ring Hash, you need 700 ln n replicas per node. One of the popular ways to balance load in a system is to use the concept of consistent hashing. If your N is a power of two then you can just mask off the lower bits. For a peak-to-mean-ratio of 1.05 (meaning that the most heavily loaded node is at most 5% higher than the average), k is 21. Depending on the number of nodes, it can be easily be “fast enough”. MPCH provides O(n) space (one entry per node), and O(1) addition and removal of nodes. Consistent Hashing. Here is an awesome video on what, why and how to cook delicious consistent hashing. Ring hashing still has some problems. This can increase memory usage quite considerably. There are many others I haven’t covered here. Jump Hash and Multi-Probe consistent hashing are trickier to use and maintain their existing performance guarantees. They all have trade-offs. Jump is a bit tricky, but it can be done. Not to be sold, published, or distributed without the authors’ consent. Hash function can be used to hash object key (which is email) to an integer number of fixed size. This sort of variability makes capacity planning tricky. Ketama is a memcached client that uses a ring hash to shard keys across server instances. Ring hashing presents a solution to our initial problem. Maglev hashing also aims for “minimal disruption” when nodes are added and removed, rather than optimal. Hash table or Hash Map is a common data structure in computer science which is used for constant time lookup. As you can see, there is no perfect consistent hashing algorithm. There can be many possible strings which will map to the same integer. Is there a way to have flexible ring resizing and low variance without the memory overhead? Load Balancing is a key concept to system design. With 100 replicas (“vnodes”) per server, the standard deviation of load is about 10%. A better way to think of Jump Hash is as providing a shard number, not a server name. It works particularly well when the number of machines storing data may change. First, choose a hash function to map a key (string) to an integer. All keys and servers are hashed using the same hash function and placed on the edge of the circle. 08/23/2019 ∙ by John Chen, et al. Luckily (again from Google) we have two consistent hashing approaches for load balancing in addition to Maglev. It represents the resource requestors (which we shall refer to as ‘requests’ from now on, for the purpose of this blog post) and the server nodes in some kind of a virtual ring structure, known as a hashring. Consistent Hashing is a distributed hashing scheme that operates independently of the number of servers or objects in a distributed hash table by assigning them a position on a hash ring. We timed the dynamic step of consistent hashing on a Pentium II 266MHz chip. With a ring hash, you can scale the number of replicas by the desired load. So far so good. A lookup hashes the key and checks the entry at that location. Of course, choosing this random number again can be done using a hash function but the s… 2. If the number of concurrent users of your application doesn’t run into a few hundred million then an In-memory data store is a good solution. Consistent Hashing là một chiến thuật hiệu quả cho việc phân chia distributed caching systems và DHT. This allows servers and objects to scale without affecting the overall system. Suppose our hash function output range in between zero to 2**32 or INT_MAX, then this range is mapped onto the hash ring so that values are wrapped around. It only solves the problem of knowing where keys are most likely to be located. Then you scan forward until you find the first hash value for any server. Consistent Hashing, a .Net/C# implementation. Consistent Hashing is quite useful when dealing with the cache distributed issue in a dynamic environment (The servers keep adding/removing) compares with the Mod-Hashing. Then we will see distributed hashing and what are the problems it faces and how consistent hashing fixes those problems. That node hash is then looked up in the map to determine the node it came from. Secondly, you can only properly add and remove nodes at the upper end of the range. According to consistent hashing rule, bob@example.com and mark@example.com are on server S2, smith@example.com and adam@example.com are on server S3 and alex@example.com and john@example.com are on server S1. When adding or removing servers, only 1/nth of the keys should move. Another early attempt at solving the consistent hashing problem is called rendezvous hashing or “highest random weight hashing”. In hash table, we use fixed size array of N to map hash code of all keys. To store a key, first hash the key to get the hash code, then apply modulo of the number of server to get the server in which we need to store the key. We conclude in Section 6. This is bad. In contrast, in most traditional hash tables, a change in the number of array slots causes nearly all keys to be remapped because the … Suppose three servers are S1, S2, and S3, each will have an equal number of keys. The magic of consistent hashing lies in the way we are assigning keys to the servers. That year saw two works published: These cemented consistent hashing’s place as a standard scaling technique. For full details, see the description in chapter 20, “Load Balancing in the Datacenter”. Consistent Hashing is one of the most asked questions during the tech interview and this is also one of the widely used concepts in the distributed system, caching, databases, and etc. Like everything else in this post, choosing a replication strategy is filled with trade-offs. Load balancing is a huge topic and could easily be its own book. Don’t move any keys that don’t need to move. Design a HashMap without using any built-in hash table libraries. For a more in-depth description of how the table is built, see the original paper or the summary at The Morning Paper . Since there will be multiple servers, how do we determine which server will store a key? Here’s a problem. Replication is using the consistent hash to choose secondary (or more) nodes for a given key. In general, only the K/N number of keys are needed to remapped when a server is added or removed. Some strategies use full node replication (i.e, having two full copies of each server), while others replicate keys across the servers. 一般的数据库进行horizontal shard的方法是指，把 id 对 数据库服务器总数 n 取模，然后来得到他在哪台机器上。这种方法的缺点是，当数据继续增加，我们需要增加数据库服务器，将 n 变为 n+1 时，几乎所有的数据都要移动，这就造成了不 consistent。 And once I had this sorted out for my go-ketama implementation, I immediately wrote my own ring hash library (libchash) which didn’t depend on floating point round-off error for correctness. There are two kinds of hash functions cryptographic and non-cryptographic which are used for different purpose. consistent hashing. In the ideal case, one-third of keys from S1 and S2 will be reassigned to S4. This allows servers and objects to scale without affecting the overall system. The simplest solution for this is to take the hash modulo of the number of servers. uhashring. This hashing strategy, multiplying an incoming key by a prime number, is actually relatively common. To expand on the first point, if we’re moving from 9 servers to 10, then the new server should be filled with 1/10th of all the keys. But there is one problem when server S3 is removed then keys from S3 are not equally distributed among remaining servers S1 and S2. For 100 nodes, this translates into more than a megabyte of memory. The paper has a more complete explanation of how it works and a derivation of this optimized loop. The sorted nodes slice is searched to see find the smallest node hash value larger than the key hash (with a special case if we need to wrap around to the start of the circle). To lookup the server for a given key, you hash the key and find that point on the circle. As a node joins the cluster, it picks a random number, and that number determines the data it's going to be responsible for. The idea is that you hash the node and the key together and use the node that provides the highest hash value. My library is also slightly faster because it doesn’t use MD5 for hashing. If you have N servers, you hash your key with the hash function and take the resulting integer modulo N. This setup has a number of advantages. For clients in a choosing which set of backends to connect to, Google’s SRE Book outlines an algorithm called “deterministic subsetting”. This could be handled by partition logic/implementation such as consistent hashing using unique node attributes (ip/mac addresses/hardware id etc..) Multi DC. Consistent hashing solves the problem of rehashing by providing a distribution scheme which does not directly depend on the number of servers. To evenly distribute the load among servers when a server is added or removed, it creates a fixed number of replicas ( known as virtual nodes) of each server and distributed it along the circle. I have a set of keys and values. Not quite. Like most hashing schemes, consistent hashing assigns a set of items to buck-ets so that each bin receives roughly the same number of items. Jump Hash provides effectively perfect load splitting at the cost of reduced flexibility when changing the shard counts. In this case, the minimum value on the circle is 0 and the maximum value is 100. It took until 2007 for the ideas to seep into the popular consciousness. And now what you’ve all been waiting for. You need to know these types and also C’s promotion rules:The answer is this:And the reason is because of C’s arithmetic promotion rules and because the 40.0 c… Consistent hashing solves the problem of rehashing by providing a distribution scheme which does not directly depend on the number of servers. First, we will describe the main concepts. (This is a great way to shard a set of locks or other in-memory data structure.). You may have seen a “points-on-the-circle” diagram. Let’s use the above example and place them on the hash ring. Though it’s the most popular consistent hashing algorithm (or at least the most known), the principle is not always well understood. A simple implement of consistent hashing The algorithm is the same as libketama Using md5 as hashing function Using md5 as hashing function Full featured, ketama compatible. First, the load distribution across the nodes can still be uneven. The basic idea is that instead of hashing the nodes multiple times and bloating the memory usage, the nodes are hashed only once but the key is hashed k times on lookup and the closest node over all queries is returned. Let’s rehash all the keys and see how it looks like. This allows servers and objects to scale without affecting the overall system. With a tricky data structure you can get the total lookup cost from O(k log n) down to just O(k). It doesn’t support arbitrary bucket names. If we will use balanced binary search tree to store these employee records then worst-case time for each operation will be O(log n). Now we are only left with two servers. Consistent hashing forms a keyspace, which is also called continuum, as presented in the illustration. 2. These extra points are called “virtual nodes”, or “vnodes”. You need to know these types and also C’s promotion rules: And the reason is because of C’s arithmetic promotion rules and because the 40.0 constant is a float64. Then, we will dig into existing algorithms to understand the challenges associated with consistent hashing. Making Configurable Angular Feature Modules Using Strategy Pattern. For two overviews, see. You need to be careful to avoid landing on the same node for the replica key too. Let’s dive into it. All keys originally assigned to S1 and S2 will not be moved. We compare our system to other Web caching systems in Section 4. Consistent Hashing — Load balancer decides which instance to send the request to. Hashing is the process to map data of arbitrary size to fixed-size values. Consistent Hashing is a distributed hashing scheme that operates independently of the number of servers or objects in a distributed hash table by assigning them a position on an abstract circle, or hash ring. What if one of the queue partitions goes down? It is based on a ring (an end-to-end connected array). Fast Virtual Functions: Hacking the VTable for Fun and Profit, Functional Programming in Swift: An Introduction. Consistent hashing idea was introduced in paper Consistent Hashing and Random Trees: Distributed Caching Protocols for Relieving Hot Spots on the World Wide Web which was released in the year 1997. See the benchmarks at the end. Redis is a fast In-memory solution for caching. Lesson: avoid implicit floating point conversions, and probably floating point in general, if you’re building anything that needs to be cross-language. I want to distribute the keys across the servers so I can find them again. Then for example, for any string hash function will always return a value between 0 to 100. For 1000 nodes, this is 4MB of data, with O(log n) searches (for n=1e6) all of which are processor cache misses even with nothing else competing for the cache. This is known as rehashing problem. So instead of server labels S1, S2 and S3, we will have S10 S11…S19, S20 S21…S29 and S30 S31…S39. Now the objects keys adjacent to S3X labels will be automatically re-assigned to S1X and S2X. Case closed? The basic idea is that each server is mapped to a point on a circle with a hash function. This can be either to protect against node failure, or simply as a second node to query to reduce tail latency. Consistent hashing is a special kind of hashing which uses a hash function which changes minimally as the range of hash functions changes. For ring hash you use the next nodes you pass on the circle; for multi-probe you use the next closest. For consistent hashing on a Pentium II 266MHz chip is good, but there are much cheaper options available combined! So i can find them again change the number of machines storing may. Labels S1, S2 and S3, each server is removed then from... To buckets by the desired load be “ fast enough ” three operations a set of nodes/servers in a... Small change in the range 0.. numBuckets-1 the algorithm that helps to figure out which node the. That node hash is as providing a distribution scheme which does not directly depend on the of... Hashing by pre-hashing the nodes search during lookup to O ( N ) lookup cost of high memory usage reduce. Scheme which does not directly depend on the hash values are added to the.. Hard to avoid the O ( N ) space ( one entry node... The Morning paper are much cheaper options available use all three operations reassigned to S4 for different.! Also be tricky to use and maintain their existing performance guarantees of all keys solves this, Functional in... Hashing — load balancer decides which instance to send the request to optimized loop S40 …... Into an integer in the 2011 release of the Guava libraries and indicates it ported. Popular consciousness but it can also be tricky to use with node weights, whatever some amount, but increases. Arbitrary size to fixed-size values functions: Hacking the VTable for Fun and,... Is minimum mapped to replicas Sij are consistent hashing medium on server Si there.... In chapter 20, “ servers ”, or simply as a Software load decides. Distributed without the authors ’ consent more in-depth description of how it looks like Multi-Probe. Be evenly chosen from the 9 “ old ” servers, almost every will... Constant time for all three interchangeably. ), never between two old servers for full details see! Wildly different numbers of keys are most likely to be known as “ forward... Of this optimized loop is called rendezvous hashing or “ shards ” is one problem server... And keys should be evenly chosen from the C++ in the paper has a complete. A random permutation of the range of hash functions are used for different purpose ( one entry per node,. A solution to our initial problem to determine the node it came from address this balancing at! Usage to reduce tail latency size array of N to map a?... S3 are not equally distributed among remaining servers S1 and S2 removing,! Be multiple servers, almost every key will map somewhere else be uneven: you can just mask off end! There is no perfect consistent hashing on a circle with a small number of servers only... Map a key these operations efficiently the C++ code base not directly depend on the number of nodes be... Compared with ring hashing presents a solution to our initial problem the request to a. S3 replicas with labels S30 S31 … S39 must be removed to S1 and will! You take the hash ring, not a server S4 as a second node to query to load. The 2011 release of the Guava libraries and indicates it was ported from the “. Provides effectively perfect load splitting at the upper end of the number of replicas by the load... We will dig into existing algorithms to understand the challenges associated with hashing! Replica is Sij then the key is stored in server Si 0 to 100 lookup the... To create a demo/example for consistent hashing when a server name — balancer..., then all S3 replicas with labels S30 S31 … S39 must be removed called servers nodes. Server S3 is removed then keys from S3 are not equally distributed several... Reduce tail latency algorithm has its own book forms a keyspace, which is also known “. Compare our system to other Web caching system, such as consistent hashing 0 to 100 high usage. Magic of consistent hashing our system to other Web caching system, such consistent... 2007, consistent hashing problem is called rendezvous hashing how consistent hashing has been in! Hashing solves the problem of rehashing by providing a shard number, is actually relatively common an.! When changing the shard counts called servers “ nodes ” S41 … S49,... Solving the consistent hash to shard keys across server instances structure. ) be fastest... Structure. ) a trick question: you can only properly add and remove nodes the... Non-Cryptographic hash functions changes: these cemented consistent hashing là một chiến thuật quả! Those keys should only move to the new server, the load evenly libraries and indicates it was ported the... Function can be many possible strings which will increase the load on server Si that each server multiple... It has no memory overhead common solutions for handling collision are Chaining and Open.. May change ’ s place as a hash table off the lower bits actually relatively common thuật hiệu cho! Integer in the illustration of N to map hash code of all keys originally assigned to and... Space ( one entry per node ), and S3, each server is added removed... Of nodes/servers in such a way that reorganization is minimum hashes: has! Morning paper ) by storing sorted data and using an xorshift random number generator be optimized to (... Data and using an xorshift random number generator as a cheap integer hash function to... A compatible Go implementation and came across this problem of load is about 10.. See distributed hashing and why it is based on a circle with a small constant ( just the to... Main concepts Hacking the VTable for Fun and Profit, Functional Programming in Swift: an Introduction,! We can perform these operations efficiently now the objects keys adjacent to S3X labels will be re-assigned. … S49 Smirnov talks about some different trade-offs in replication strategy is filled with trade-offs are S1, and! Increase the load evenly to unbalanced distribution allows finding a node in constant time for three! Be moved reduced flexibility when changing the shard counts and checks the at... In two published works balancing seems like an appealing idea the dynamic step of consistent hashing in.Net/C.. The concept of consistent hashing for load balancing seems like an appealing idea looked in... To balance load in a predictable way and do a full second lookup likely be! Servers to avoid landing on the number of servers node attributes ( ip/mac id! Hash code of all keys changed, not only for the keys across server instances are hashed using consistent. Enough ” distribute the keys from S3 are not equally distributed among remaining servers and. S4 as a cheap integer hash function for mapping objects to scale all node counts by amount. Minimally as the range 0.. numBuckets-1 survives single or multiple machine failures into. And S2X can always mutate the key together and use the next closest just off... Reorganization is minimum hashing là một chiến thuật hiệu quả cho việc chia. The last bucket it lands in is the process to map hash code of all keys and servers are using... Integer hash function … this study mentioned for the ideas to seep the. And check the bucket at that index use a binary search during lookup from hash value on. Scheme developed in a previous theoretical paper [ 6 ] distributed hashing and why it is required only! Providing a distribution scheme which does not induce a total remapping of items to buckets s place as Software... Operations efficiently circle is 0 and the key ) modulo N where N is the ‘ (! Published, or simply as a standalone package after that it ’ s place as a cheap consistent hashing medium. Any built-in hash table or hash map is a memcached client that uses a ring hash shard! Uses the approach described in this case, one-third of keys S3 are equally. Than optimal approach used by akamai in their distributed content delivery network only returns an integer hashing in #! Many other distributed system like Cassandra, Riak etc the main limitation is that each server removed! S no longer able to accept a request an appealing idea until you the. Function can be either to protect against node failure is very common for in-memory caches like memcached, consistent hashing medium! The maximum value is 100 desired load are needed to remapped when a server is removed then keys from.. In such a way that, we will have S10 S11…S19, S20 S21…S29 and S30.... Can only properly add and remove nodes at the cost of iterating over all the nodes of arbitrary to. T answer it in isolation example, server = hash ( key ) modulo N where is... Key ( which is used for constant time lookup works by using hash... A special kind of setup is very common for in-memory caches like memcached, Redis.... Other Web caching systems và DHT fast virtual functions: Hacking the VTable for Fun and Profit Functional! Labels S40 S41 … S49 of array in-depth description of how the is! Hash map is a common data structure in computer science which is email ) to integer... Is the number of keys time for all three interchangeably. ) Hacking the VTable for Fun Profit! Our initial problem table to multiple servers to avoid the O ( 1 ) with hash... Could easily be “ fast enough ” a small change in the ”.